Open invitation
The Physical Universe series is building toward a physical — not merely mathematical — description of the vacuum, gravity, and stellar energy. That programme needs two things: scientists willing to engage with the argument, and capital willing to fund the experiments. If you are either, this page is for you.
Who this is for
Physicists, engineers, and researchers who work on vacuum structure, quantum foundations, gravity, or fusion — and who want to engage with an argument, challenge a claim, or discuss what an experimental programme would actually look like. Critique is as welcome as agreement.
You are spending $1 trillion on AI infrastructure that will hit a hard power ceiling within two years. The cost of seriously testing whether the physical account of the vacuum is complete is a rounding error against that number. The return, if it is not, ends the problem permanently.
You read the series, you have a question, a challenge, or something to add. That conversation is also worth having.
The asymmetry
If you are a scientist: the argument is in the series. Read it, find the weakest point, and tell me what it is. That is the conversation worth having — not agreement, but rigorous engagement with what the evidence actually requires.
If you are an investor or an AI company: the question is not whether this is possible. It is what the minimum credible experiment looks like, and what it costs against what is already being spent. That conversation starts here.
Thank you for reaching out. Every serious enquiry gets a serious response. Amit will be in touch shortly.
Follow the series on Medium. New articles are published as the Physical Universe series develops. The conversation happens in the comments as much as in the text.
Read on Medium →